TrapMetrics
HomeTrack researchTrap bias at Oxford: which traps actually win

Trap bias at Oxford: which traps actually win

··5 min read

Trap bias at Oxford measured on 4,680 races over 2 years: share of wins by trap against fair share, by distance and by grade, with the noise called noise.

trap biastrack geometryoxford

Over the last 2 years at Oxford, 4,680 races, no trap has been clearly better or worse than its fair share: every difference is inside noise. The track is 397 metres round with 100 metres to the first bend, measured from our own split times.

Share of wins by trap at Oxford against fair share
Share of wins by trap at Oxford against fair share

All distances

Trap Runs Wins Win rate Share of wins Fair share Bias Read
1 3,968 744 18.8% 15.9% 16.2% -0.3 noise
2 4,427 861 19.4% 18.4% 18.1% +0.3 noise
3 4,373 861 19.7% 18.4% 17.9% +0.5 noise
4 4,311 802 18.6% 17.1% 17.6% -0.5 noise
5 4,253 848 19.9% 18.1% 17.4% +0.7 noise
6 3,133 564 18.0% 12.1% 12.8% -0.8 noise

Trap 1 sits inside noise at -0.3 points. Trap 2 sits inside noise at +0.3 points. Trap 3 sits inside noise at +0.5 points. Trap 4 sits inside noise at -0.5 points. Trap 5 sits inside noise at +0.7 points. Trap 6 sits inside noise at -0.8 points.

By distance

Only distances with at least 1,500 runs get their own chart; a bias that shows at one trip and not another is usually the run to the first bend at work.

450 metres, 3,047 races

Share of wins by trap at Oxford over 450 metres
Share of wins by trap at Oxford over 450 metres

Trap 1 sits inside noise at +0.2 points. Trap 2 sits inside noise at +0.0 points. Trap 3 sits inside noise at +0.8 points. Trap 4 sits inside noise at +0.1 points. Trap 5 sits inside noise at +0.5 points. Trap 6 is a clear minus: 10.5% of wins against a fair share of 12.1%, -1.6 points on 1,914 runs.

253 metres, 1,372 races

Share of wins by trap at Oxford over 253 metres
Share of wins by trap at Oxford over 253 metres

No clear bias at 253 metres: every trap is inside noise on 1,372 races.

By grade

Grade letters grouped: A for graded races, D for sprints and dashes where the track uses them, S for stayers, and so on.

Grade Races T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
A 2,659 -0.2 -0.3 +1.1 +0.2 +0.5 -1.4
D 1,290 -1.5 +1.6 -0.4 -1.4 +1.7 +0.0
O 621 +1.5 +0.9 -0.2 -1.7 -0.6 +0.2

Bias in points against fair share; * marks a clear bias.

The market and the fields

The Betfair favourite won 38.7% of 4,657 priced races here over the window. 55% of races went off with six runners; the rest had a vacant trap, which is why fair share is measured on runs and not assumed to be one sixth.

How to read this

Fair share is each trap's share of the runs, so a vacant trap 6 does not hand trap 5 a bias. A bias is called clear only when it is at least 1.5 points and at least 2.5 standard errors from fair on the runs behind it; anything smaller is a difference inside noise, and the page says so. The window is the last 2 years, refreshed whenever this page is rebuilt. The live version, with the going and our own accuracy at this track, is on the track page.

Questions this piece answers

Which trap wins most at Oxford?

Over the last 2 years no trap at Oxford is clearly better or worse than its fair share of runs: the differences are inside noise on 4,680 races.

How is fair share worked out?

Each trap's fair share is its share of the runs, not one sixth. A trap that was vacant in many races has fewer runs and so a smaller fair share; comparing its wins with a sixth would invent a bias.

How often does the favourite win at Oxford?

The Betfair market favourite won 38.7% of 4,657 races with a settled price over the last 2 years.

T
The Edge AnalystGreyhound racing and statistical analysis

The analyst behind TrapMetrics: the person who built the rating model, runs it every morning, and writes up what it finds. About the writer

Your next step

Find your place in the research.

Try the tools, read the evidence and choose the access that fits your questions.

View access optionsOpen a real race

Register before accounts open and Research is £19.99 a month, locked in.